WorkflowBack to dashboard

Flight Reservation Modification Flight Cancellation Refund Other Cabin Class Upgrade Downgrade New Flight Booking Booking Conflict Resolution Flight Delay Compensation

Metric scope

Workflow metrics are projected; evidence stays tied to analyzed threads

Projected workflow runs50 / moThis workflow represented 15 of 300 analyzed threads.

Analyzed workflow sample15 threadsFindings, recommendations, and evidence cards are still anchored to the normalized workflow sample.

Projection factor3.3xApplied to this workflow's spend, savings, runs, and token totals. Confidence: medium.

Source pool996 sessionsThe full source-pool population used by the dashboard projection.

derived-booking-conflict-resolution · Based on 15 threads · medium confidence

Booking Conflict Resolution

Derived primarily from user-authored prompts across a 300-thread slice. Full-slice prompt clustering ran on every thread, and Claude consolidated the major workflow types from cluster exemplars because the slice exceeds the non-sampling threshold.

Projected spend / mo$1.29sample $0.39

Projected savings / mo$0.37sample $0.11 · Could cut spend by ~29%

Projected runs / mo50sample 15

Projected total tokens318Kavg 6.4K per run

Projected input / output96.1K / 221.9K

This workflow

Token and spend trend

8 hour buckets

Dec 4 5AM

Dec 4 7AM

Dec 5 12AM

Dec 17 4PM

Dec 17 5PM

Dec 17 7PM

Dec 17 8PM

Dec 17 10PM

Input tokensOutput tokens

Model mix

Tokens and spend by model

5 models

Tokens by model

input + output

gemini-3-pro-preview83.3K tokens

172 calls37.7% of total

Kimi-K263.6K tokens

107 calls28.7% of total

Claude Opus 4.556.3K tokens

93 calls25.4% of total

GPT-5.214.4K tokens

28 calls6.5% of total

GPT-5.1-CODEX3.6K tokens

16 calls1.6% of total

Spend by model

estimated cost

Claude Opus 4.5$1.05

77.3% of total

gemini-3-pro-preview$0.10

7.1% of total

GPT-5.2$0.10

7.6% of total

Kimi-K2$0.08

6.1% of total

GPT-5.1-CODEX$0.02

1.8% of total

Opportunities

2 opportunities for this workflow

$0.37 projected

Tool misuse

Failed benchmark outcomes are still paying the full workflow cost

The imported outcome labels show a high failure rate after the workflow has already spent tokens and tool calls, which points to missing early exits or weak preflight checks.

$0.20projected / month savedsample $0.06/mo

high riskmedium confidence

Recommended changes

Compare passing and failing traces for this workflow and add an early gate before the expensive tool loop starts.
Use the imported outcome label as an evaluation dimension so regressions are ranked by wasted spend, not just by raw failure count.

Evidence (1)

StepImported failing outcome

Imported benchmark outcome ended with failure

Tool misuse

Tool loops are dense enough to need batching or early stopping

tool dominates repeated tool activity, so the workflow is likely doing incremental calls where batching, caching, or tighter stop conditions would reduce churn.

$0.17projected / month savedsample $0.05/mo

medium riskhigh confidence

Recommended changes

Batch or cache repeated tool calls where the inputs overlap across adjacent steps.
Add a per-run tool budget and stop condition so failed runs do not keep exploring after the likely answer is already unreachable.

Prompt composition

Input token breakdown

28.9K tokens

user28.9K · 100%

Tool signals

How this workflow runs

Retries0

How often steps had to re-run.

Delegated subtasks0

Tasks handed off to sub-agents during the workflow.

Documents retrieved0

Total documents pulled in across all tool calls.

Median step latency0 ms

Typical time each step takes to finish.

Stage order

Typical workflow path

5 steps

1
Loop×2
Loop: respond → plan → tool — repeats 2 times.
Latency unavailable1.1K tok avg
1. 1
  Respondgemini-3-pro-preview
  Respond step in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable304 tok avg
2. 2
  Plangemini-3-pro-preview
  Plan the next steps in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable151 tok avg
3. 3
  Tooltool
  Tool step in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable80 tok avg
2
Loop×37
Loop: plan → tool — repeats 37 times.
Latency unavailable8.5K tok avg
1. 1
  Plangemini-3-pro-preview
  Plan the next steps in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable151 tok avg
2. 2
  Tooltool
  Tool step in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable80 tok avg
Respondgemini-3-pro-preview
Respond step in the workflow.
Latency unavailable304 tok avg
4
Loop×59
Loop: plan → tool — repeats 59 times.
Latency unavailable13.6K tok avg
1. 1
  Plangemini-3-pro-preview
  Plan the next steps in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable151 tok avg
2. 2
  Tooltool
  Tool step in the workflow.
  Latency unavailable80 tok avg
Verify
Verify step in the workflow.
Latency unavailable146 tok avg

Threads

Pick a thread to see what happened

15 threads

Cost per run$0.08

Monthly runs1

Monthly cost$0.08

Operation path46 named tool/models

1
RespondRespond
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
7 tok · $0.00
2
RespondRespond
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
354 tok · $0.01
3
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
202 tok · $0.00
4
toolTool
Run tooltool
147 tok
5
toolTool
Run tooltool
180 tok
6
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
291 tok · $0.00
7
toolTool
Run tooltool
19 tok
8
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
242 tok · $0.00
9
toolTool
Run tooltool
33 tok
10
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
261 tok · $0.00
11
toolTool
Run tooltool
64 tok
12
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
271 tok · $0.00
13
toolTool
Run tooltool
665 tok
14
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
251 tok · $0.00
15
toolTool
Run tooltool
12 tok
16
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
271 tok · $0.00
17
toolTool
Run tooltool
665 tok
18
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
271 tok · $0.00
19
toolTool
Run tooltool
600 tok
20
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
271 tok · $0.00
21
toolTool
Run tooltool
183 tok
22
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
293 tok · $0.00
23
toolTool
Run tooltool
3 tok
24
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
271 tok · $0.00
25
toolTool
Run tooltool
165 tok
26
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
398 tok · $0.01
27
toolTool
Run tooltool
23 tok
28
RespondRespond
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
570 tok · $0.01
29
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
95 tok · $0.00
30
toolTool
Run tooltool
2 tok
31
toolTool
Run tooltool
5 tok
32
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
189 tok · $0.00
33
toolTool
Run tooltool
3 tok
34
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
189 tok · $0.00
35
toolTool
Run tooltool
7 tok
36
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
107 tok · $0.00
37
toolTool
Run tooltool
56 tok
38
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
189 tok · $0.00
39
toolTool
Run tooltool
57 tok
40
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
115 tok · $0.00
41
toolTool
Run tooltool
417 tok
42
PlanPlan
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
189 tok · $0.00
43
toolTool
Run tooltool
13 tok
44
RespondRespond
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
289 tok · $0.01
45
RespondRespond
claude-opus-4-5claude-opus-4-5
46 tok · $0.00
46
dataset evaluationTool
Run dataset_evaluationdataset_evaluation
100 tok
47
Imported benchmark outcomeVerify
Imported benchmark outcome
108 tok

The old plan/tool string was the normalized span order. Rows above use imported operation records; when a tool name is missing, the source only provided the normalized stage and operation label.

Snapshots

full_transcriptSnapshot 1 · imported

Hi! How can I help you today? Hi! I need some help with a couple of things. First, I’d like to remove a passenger named Ethan from my reservation—can you help with that? Also, I’m…